The latest installment of the President’s Notes from Dr. Schwaller includes the following on budgets, most specifically regarding classroom revitalization and the twin issues of salaries and workload:
Budget Update
As I reported in March, the Administrative Cabinet studied and modified the Strategic Goals established last summer. In April the Cabinet considered budget requests from the various divisions of campus, in light of the goals. Our funding decisions, however, remained tentative until we knew with a greater degree of certainty what our 2007-2008 budget would be. Now, in late June, the full Leadership Council met for two days with representatives of the Faculty Senate to deal with many issues, one of which was to review and evaluate the strategic goals. Those discussions resulted in a slight modification of the goals and confirmed the budget priorities established earlier. As such, the Cabinet has finalized a funding plan for 2007-2008
Funded initiatives include some items that require recurring, on-going funding, while others can be satisfied with one-time-only expenditures. The following items were funded:
- Faculty salary increases
- Replacement furniture and accessories for classrooms, labs, and studios
- Overhaul of the campus web site
- CTS programmers to implement degree audit and other integral programs
- Operating budget for graduate student recruitment and marketing
- Admissions expenses (recruitment travel, campus hosting, postage, telephone, etc)
- Cost Increases in expendables for Physical Plant (toilet paper, paper towels, salt, sand, etc.)
- Activities programming in Student Union
- Career Placement Assistant Director
- NCATE accreditation visit (one time only)
The campus budget, while again beginning in the black this year, does not provide much room for new initiatives. Those that were funded rose to the top of the list because each had an impact on several of our strategic priorities. For example, new classroom furniture positively impacts the student experiences, can assist us in recruiting and retaining students, improves faculty worklife by providing a more pleasant atmosphere in which to work, and because it may improve recruitment and retention of students can provide us with yet more resources. A very few items, such as the costs associated with our NCATE accreditation, were mandatory.
In our deliberations, faculty salary and teaching workload were among our highest priorities. The Workload Task Force has made its first report. A final plan for reducing workload has not been developed. Once that occurs, we will allocate funds as available to support the eventual plan.
As the academic year begins and we have a clearer idea of where our enrollments will stabilize, we will better be able to project the final budget of the year. We will also, then, begin the process of looking to the next budget cycle and those initiatives that can assist us to further our strategic goals
July 30, 2007 at 2:32 pm
As we think about the new year and what we can do as UUP, please let me know what you would like to see from the chapter, regarding President Schwaller’s notes or any other issue.
August 26, 2007 at 1:26 pm
i second that comment.
professional staff are not compensated in this round of increases. we need to know that our needs are going to be addressed and resolved and when this will begin.